Planning the method and scope of the talent management plan

In 2024 Mentornet piloted the Advanced Certificate on Occupational Learning: Learning and Development Advisor, on NQF Level 7. Learners had to submit more than 50 practical assignments to be declared ready for the EISA. This gave me the idea to share their products with other learning providers and learners in occupational and vocational learning. So, I asked the learners who achieved a distinction for assignments for permission to publish their submissions as articles on our Intgrty website. Articles are published unanimously for obvious reasons.

The following steps can be taken to plan the method and scope of the talent management plan:

1. Conduct a Skills Needs Analysis

Purpose: Identify gaps between current employee capabilities and future organisational requirements.

Approach: Use a combination of methods such as brainstorming, focus groups, interviews, and document analysis to gather information on talent needs. Include job-specific assessments, such as task and process analysis, to align skills with organisational goals.

Tools:

  • Questionnaires and surveys for broad input.
  • Observation and reverse engineering for detailed role-specific insights.

2. Develop Role Profiles

  • Include job purpose, key responsibilities, required competencies, and critical success factorsfor each role.
  • Categorise roles into tiers: leadership, technical, and operational.

3. Establish Talent Pipelines

  • Identify high-potential employees (HIPOs) and critical positions that need immediate or future succession planning.
  • Use performance evaluations, potential assessments, and feedback from department heads.

4. Design Individual Development Plans (IDPs)

  • Incorporate training programs, mentorship opportunities, and leadership development initiatives.
  • Align learning outcomes with organisational objectives, such as improved productivity and leadership readiness.

5. Integrate Monitoring and Feedback Mechanisms

  • Use performance management tools to track employee progress.
  • Conduct regular review sessions with managers and HR to adjust development plans as needed.

The scope of the talent management plan

On organisational level you should address the needs of all departments, focusing on roles critical to achieving strategic objectives.

Stakeholders Involved

Stakeholders can include HR professionals, department heads, mentors, and employees.

Ensure participation from both managerial and operational levels to build a holistic view of talent requirements.

Key Focus Areas. Key focus areas should include skills development, leadership succession and retention.

Skills Development: Focus on role-specific skills and cross-functional competencies.

Leadership Succession: Identify and groom future leaders for critical roles.

Retention Strategies: Develop plans to retain high-potential employees and minimise turnover.

Alignment with Strategic Objectives

  • Ensure talent management supports the organisation’s mission, vision, and values.
  • Prioritise current and future business needs, such as technological advancements or expansion plans.

5. Timeframe

Implement the plan over a 12-month period with quarterly reviews and adjustments based on progress and organisational changes.

Continue Reading

Reviewing the facilitation of a learning event

INTGRTY ARTICLES WRITTEN BY OUR LEARNERS

In 2024 we (Mentornet) piloted the Advanced Certificate on Occupational Learning: Learning and Development Advisor, on NQF Level 7. Learners had to submit more than 50 practical assignments to be declared ready for the EISA. This gave me the idea to share their products with other learning providers and learners in occupational and vocational learning. So, I asked the learners who achieved a distinction for assignments for permission to publish their submissions as articles on our Intgrty website. Articles are published unanimously for obvious reasons.

Reviewing the facilitation of a learning event

Facilitating a learning event requires thorough planning, effective delivery, and robust evaluation mechanisms to ensure its objectives are met. Below is an approach to reviewing the facilitation and developing an evaluation instrument.

Review of the Facilitation

A comprehensive review should assess the following areas:

1. Preparation

  • Was the learning event well-structured with clear objectives?
  • Were materials, resources, and technology properly prepared and functional?
  • Were learners given pre-event information or materials?

2. Delivery

  • Was the facilitator engaging and clear in his or her communication?
  • Were the methods (e.g., lecture, group work, hands-on activities) appropriate
  • for the learning objectives?
  • Was the event inclusive, encouraging participation from all attendees?

3. Engagement

  • Did learners actively participate in discussions or activities?
  • Were diverse learning styles (e.g., visual, auditory, kinaesthetic) addressed?
  • Was there a balance between facilitator-led and learner-driven activities?

4. Relevance

  • Did the content align with learners’ needs and goals?
  • Were real-world applications and examples provided?

5. Feedback

  • Was there a mechanism for immediate feedback during the event (e.g., Q&A, polls)?
  • Were learner questions addressed effectively?

6. Outcomes

  • Did learners achieve the stated objectives of the event?
  • Did the learners demonstrate understanding or skills during or after the event?

Developing an Evaluation Instrument

The evaluation instrument should collect feedback on the event’s effectiveness and areas for improvement. Below is an example of an evaluation form:

Learning Event Evaluation Form

Section 1: General Information

  • Name:____________________________
  • Role/Position:______________________
  • Date of Event:______________________

Section 2: Event Evaluation Rate the following statements on a scale of 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree).

1. Preparation

  • The event was well-organized.
  • Pre-event communication was clear and sufficient.
12345

2. Facilitation

  • The facilitator was knowledgeable and well-prepared.
  • The facilitator effectively engaged participants.
  • The facilitator was responsive to questions and feedback.
12345

3. Content

  • The event objectives were clear and achievable.
  • The content was relevant to my learning needs.
  • The resources and materials were helpful.
12345

4. Delivery

  • The format of the event was effective for learning.
  • Activities and discussions were engaging.
  • The event accommodated various learning styles.
12345

5. Overall Experience

  • I feel more confident about the subject matter after this event.
  • I would recommend this event to others.
12345

Section 3: Open-Ended Questions

1. What was the most valuable aspect of the learning event?

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

2. What could be improved for future events?

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

3. Any additional comments or suggestions?

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

Section 4: Future Needs

1. What topics or skills would you like covered in future events?

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

2. How can we support your continued learning?

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

Continue Reading